Indiana gay marriage

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Indiana since October 6, The state had previously restricted marriage to different-sex couples by statute in Legislation passed in denied recognition to same-sex relationships established in other jurisdictions. The legal landscape surrounding gay marriage in Indiana has transformed significantly in recent years, with the Obergefell decision playing a pivotal role in ensuring equal rights for same-sex couples.

Provides that marriage in Indiana consists only of the union of one man and one woman.

why was gay marriage illegal

Provides that Indiana law may not be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents of marriage be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups. SJR - Definition of marriage. EVANSVILLE, Ind. (AP) — The federal judge who struck down Indiana’s ban on same-sex marriages a year before the U.S. Supreme Court did so nationally has decided to step down from full-time status after 25 years.

Explore the evolution and current state of same-sex marriage laws and protections in Indiana, highlighting legal milestones and implications for couples. Indiana’s legal landscape for same-sex marriage has evolved significantly, reflecting broader national shifts in attitudes and policies. Indianapolis, Ind. Supreme Court declined to hear same-sex marriage cases from Indiana and four other states, making it possible for Hoosier same-sex couples again to be married and clearing the way for same-sex marriages to become lawful in Indiana and in at least 30 other states.

This case is over, and same-sex marriage is a reality in Indiana. This is good for Indiana. It is a great day not only for our plaintiffs and their children, but for all those who want to get married in Indiana. On Sept. District Court striking down the law banning marriage in Indiana for same-sex couples. This is a great day for fairness and equality in Indiana; it is a great day for love and marriage. We are one big step closer to the day when all same-sex couples will have the freedom to marry regardless of where they live.

The organization filed the first freedom-to-marry lawsuit for same-sex couples in , represented Edie Windsor in her successful challenge to the federal Defense of Marriage Act in June , and has filed thirteen federal marriage lawsuits on behalf of same-sex couples since then. Indiana Governor, et al. Pence, et al. Groth, Kathleen M. Sweeney and Mark W. Skip navigation. ACLU Affiliate. Media Contact. New York, NY Related Content.

Jun Here's How to Take Action. The decision in Skrmetti v. We can, and must, show up for trans youth in the courts and in our communities.

By: Gillian Branstetter. By: ACLU. Skrmetti, a challenge brought by three transgender adolescents, their families, and a Memphis-based medical provider against a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming hormone therapies for transgender people under That means SB1 can remain in effect. Notably, however, the decision is based on the record in and context of the Tennessee case and therefore does not extend to other cases concerning discrimination based on transgender status.

The Court left undisturbed Supreme Court and lower court precedent that other examples of discrimination against transgender people are unlawful. We are as determined as ever to fight for the dignity and equality of every transgender person and we will continue to do so with defiant strength, a restless resolve, and a lasting commitment to our families, our communities, and the freedom we all deserve.

Make no mistake, gender-affirming care is often life-saving care, and all major medical associations have determined it to be safe, appropriate, and effective. This is a sad day, and the implications will reverberate for years and across the country, but it does not shake our resolve to continue fighting.